Keefektifan Kalimat Bahasa Pengantar dalam Praktik Debat Siswa Kelas X IPA Madrasah Aliyah Negeri Tanjungpinang T.A. 2017/2018

Main Article Content

Renaning Widyawati

Abstract

This study abaout discusses language as a communication tool to understand an argument in learning the practice of debate. The method used in the practice of the debate uses a scientific learning approach in accordance with the 2013 curriculum used in education units. After students observe the motion (theme) of the debate, students then arrange arguments according to the division of affirmation (support) or contra (reject) groups by using three aspects of the effectiveness of the sentences that have been determined. The three aspects in question are (1) clarity of sentence function elements, (2) freedom from structural contamination, (3) freedom from regional and foreign language interference. The results of the analysis with three grammatical aspects are presented. The results of the analysis showed an increase in the percentage after the explanation of the language so that the level of students understanding of the debate motions described through arguments could be understood better and the debate to be interestingly. On the basic of this research, it can be said that spoken language in the language of instruction in teaching and learning activities needs attention, so that the function of language as a communication tool can be carried out properly.

Article Details

How to Cite
Widyawati, R. (2021). Keefektifan Kalimat Bahasa Pengantar dalam Praktik Debat Siswa Kelas X IPA Madrasah Aliyah Negeri Tanjungpinang T.A. 2017/2018. TANJAK : Journal of Education and Teaching, 2(2), 120–125. https://doi.org/10.35961/tanjak.v2i2.277
Section
Articles

References

Arifin, Zainal dan Junaiyah. (2008). Sintaksis. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.

Arikunto, S. (1989). Prosedur Penelitian. Bandung: Angkasa.

Arikunto, S. (2007). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Berlian, S. (2010, Juni 18). Lisan Dan Tulisan. Diakses dari https://rubrikbahasa.wordpress.com/2010/06/18/lisan-dan-tulisan.

Depdikbud. (2008). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Faizah, A. R. H. (2011). Konjungsi Klausa Objek dalam Kalimat Subordinat Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 13, 3-6. http://journals.unpad.ac.id/sosiohumaniora/article/view/5463. Diunduh Senin, 9 Agustus 2021 pukul 19.30.

Hidayah, N. (2013). Panduan Praktis Penyusunan dan Pelaporan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.

Kemendikbud. (2016). Buku Guru Bahasa Indonesia SMA/MA/SMK/MAK Kelas X. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Kemendikbud. (2016). Bahasa Indonesia SMA/MA/SMK/MAK Kelas X. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Keraf, Gorys. (1984). Tata Bahasa Indonesia. Ende-Flores: Nusa Indah.

Markhamah. (2013). Ragam dan Analisis Kalimat Bahasa Indonesia. Muhammadiyah University Press: Surakarta.

Markhamah. (2013). Analisis dan Kesantunan Berbahasa. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta: Surakarta.

Nasir, M. (2003). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2006). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.