The Implementation of HOTS in Teaching English at Tenth Grade of MTI Pasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v2i01.215Keywords:
Implementation, HOTS, Teaching strategyAbstract
This research was conducted because HOTS is a significant factor in achieving the learning process in accordance with the 2013 curriculum, HOTS is a solution that students become active and participatory in the learning process, teachers not only explain learning in front of the class, but students must be more active to describe the problems that were found during learning, therefore, the researcher wanted to investigate how the HOTS process was implemented in teaching English at X grade of MTI Pasia in the 2019/2020 school year. The purpose of this research to know how the English teacher at X grade of MTI Pasia apply HOTS in Teaching english process, especially in developing productive and receptive skills according to the level of critical thinking.This type of this research was a qualitative descriptive study, the instruments of this study were documentation (document analysis) and observation sheets to collected the data. The subjects in this study was X grade English teachers at MTI Pasia in the 2019/2020 academic year. The results of this study obtained from the document analysis and observation sheets found that, the English teacher at X gradeof MTI pasia did not apply HOTS in teaching English and learning process. The English teacher only applied HOTS to the learning design, it was not apply to the process in learning, this happened not because it was caused by online learning due to COVID 19 pandemic, but it was happened because the teacher did not encourage learning to be effective during thepandemic, the teacher should still be able to improved the learning process using technological advances,even though it was still a long of perfection than face-to-face learning.
References
Anderson, L., kratwohl, m. R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R. (2001). A axonomy for learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A revision of Blooms Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (complete edition). New York: Longman
Bamanger & Gashan. (2014). “In-Service EFL Teachers‟ Beliefs about Teaching Reading Strategies”. Canadian Center of Science and Education.
Broughton Geffrey. (1980). Teaching English as a Foreign Language. New York: Routledge.
Carol griffiths. (1997). English language learning strategy. Toronto: Ontario Institute for studies in education.
Christopher Klopper and steve drew. (1987). Teaching for learning and learning for teaching. Clayton, Australia: Monash University.
Emi Rofiah, Nonoh Siti Aminah, and Elvin Yusliana Ekawati (2013) ‘Penyusunan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Fisika Pada Siswa SMP’, Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika
Flower, L. A. & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College composition and communication
Gordon Eisenman and Beverly D Payne. (2016).‘Effects of the Higher Order Thinking Skills Program on At-Risk Young Adolescents' Self-Concept , Reading Achievement , and Thinking Skills Effects of the Higher Order Thinking Skills Program on At-Risk Young Adolescents' and Thinking Skills’, Routledge Taylor and Francis Group
Husamah. (2016). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Universitas Muhamadiyah Malang.
King, FJ, Ludwika Goodson, and Faranak Rohani. (1997). Higher Order Thinking Skills; Definition, Teaching Strategies, Assessment. Tersedia pada: cala.fsu.edu.
Langer, Judith, A. (1991). Literacy and schooling: A sociocognitive perspective, In Hiebert Elfrieda, (Ed.), Literacy for a diverse society: Perspectives, practices and policies, New York: Teachers CollegePress.
Gay, L.R.(1990). Educational research. Singapore: Merill Publishing company
Margana, & Widyantoro, A. (2017). January. Developing English textbooks oriented to higherorder thinking skills for students of Vocational High Schools in Yogyakarta. Journal of Language Teaching and Research.
Margono. (2007).Metode Penelitian pendidikan, Jakarta: Rhineka Chipta,
Moffett, J. & Wagner, B. J. (1983). Student-centered language arts and reading, K-13: A handbook for teachers. (3rd. ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin Co.
Newman, F. M. (1990). “Higher Order Thinking in Teaching Social Studies: A Rationale For The Assessment of Classroom Thoughtfulness.” Journal of Curricular Studies
Nichols, J. 2013. 4 Essential Rules of 21st Century Learning. London.
Perkins, D. N. (1993). Teaching for understanding. American Educator, Fall
Riska Sriharyanti. (2017). Pengembangan Desain Pembelajaran Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skill Pada Siswa Kelas V Tema 6 Subtema 2 Di SD Negeri 2 Labuhan Ratu (Skripsi Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Lampung, Lampung,)
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text and the poem. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University
Sugionom (2010) Methodologi Penelitian Kualitatif and R&D. Bandung: aksara medika beta
Susan M Brookhart, (2010). How to Assess Higher Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom (ASCD: Alexandria, Virginia USA)
Tan Shin Yen and Siti Hajar Halili. 2015 ‘Effective Teaching Of Higher-Order Thinking (HOT)InEducation’, Journal Of Distance Education And E-Learning Tenaga pendidikan kementrian pendidikan dan kebudayaan. 2018. Buku pegangan pembelajaran berorientasi pada keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi. Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan. Jakarta.
Weay, A. L., Masood, M., & Abdullah, S. H. (2016). Systematic review of revised Bloom Taxonomy, SOLO Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) in assessing students’ historical understanding in learning history. Malaysian Journal of Higher Order Thinking Skills In Education
Yoki ariyana, MT. (2018). Buku pegangan pembelajaran HOTS. Direktorat jendral guru dan tenaga kependidikan kementrian pendidikan dan kebudayaan.
Zohar, A., Degani, A., & Vaaknin, E. (2001). Teachers' Beliefs about Low-Achieving Students and Higher Order Thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education
