ADDRESS TERMS USED BY AUSTRALIANS: A CASE STUDY OF MELBOURNE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v2i01.97Keywords:
Address Terms, Australia, SociolinguisticsAbstract
Abstract
The use of address terms is an important and interesting sociolinguistic aspect to be studied. In Australian contexts, there are a number of address terms existing in daily interaction. This case study focuses on how address terms are used by Australians; specifically, 1) how often Australians use the address terms mate, babe, dude, love, buddy, darling, sweetie, and honey/hon in their everyday communication, 2) to whom they mostly use the terms towards, and 3) who is more likely to use the terms between male and female. In this study, the main data collection is survey, with the questionnaires distributed to local Australians around the area of Monash University, Melbourne. The findings suggest that from the eight address terms studied, the most frequently used one in daily interaction is mate, followed by love and dude. Next, those address terms are found to be used for various specific people depending on the closeness of relationships to the speaker. In addition, some terms are usable to address both sexes, while some can be used for certain sex only. Finally, for the speaker of those address terms, mate, buddy, and dude are more popular to use among male participants, while darling, sweetie, honey, babe, and love are more popular among female speakers. The findings in this sociolinguistic study confirm the use of address terms link to feelings and solidarity as suggested by the theory.
References
Kiesling, S.F. (2004). Dude. American Speech, 79(3), 281-305
Philipsen, G., & Huspek, M. (1985). A bibliography of sociolinguistic studies of personal address. Anthropological linguistics, 27(1), 94-101. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30027934.pdf
Qin, X. (2008). Choices in terms of address: A sociolinguistic study of Chinese and American English practices. In Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-20) (Vol. 1, pp. 409-421).
Rendle-Short, J. (2010). ‘Mate’ as a term of address in ordinary interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(5), 1201-1218. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.013
Wood, L.A., & Kroger, R.O. (1991). Politeness and forms of address. Journal of language and social psychology, 10(3), 145-168. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0261927X91103001
Yang, X. (2010). Address forms of English: rules and variations. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(5), 743-745. doi:10.4304/jltr.1.5.743-745
