MODEL GRAMATIKA KOMUNIKATIF BIMBINGAN SKRIPSI MAHASISWA PROGRAM STUDI MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM STAIN SULTAN ABDURRAHMAN KEPULAUAN RIAU

Main Article Content

Eka Rihan K

Abstract

The communicative grammatical model is one of the models for viewing language competencies involving communication problems in terms of pragmatic, semantic and syntactic components. This communicative grammatical model was chosen to describe the process of student thesis guidance as to what can be communicative walking seen from the components of pragmatics, semantics and syntax. Qualitative descriptive research method. Data collection uses video or audio recording techniques when the thesis guidance process takes place. Besides that, it also uses observation guidelines and interview guide methods while data analysis uses data reduction, data presentation and conclusion / verification. The actual context has alternative units. Some of them are normal and fulfill the basic postulates of the Pragmatic Component communication process Data 19 and Data 31, there are actual context utterances using traits there and from there showing places where the same activities of the speaker and listener are performed. Some utterances in the thesis guidance process between students and supervisors have been found to have been communicative and some have not been communicative on pragmatic components, semantic components and syntactic components. Some command sentence utterances and request sentences on syntactic components have fulfilled various Indonesian sentences from the communicative point of view.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
K, Eka Rihan. “MODEL GRAMATIKA KOMUNIKATIF BIMBINGAN SKRIPSI MAHASISWA PROGRAM STUDI MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM STAIN SULTAN ABDURRAHMAN KEPULAUAN RIAU”. PERADA 2, no. 2 (December 20, 2019): 175–186. Accessed May 30, 2026. https://ejournal.stainkepri.ac.id/index.php/perada/article/view/54.
Section
Articles

References

Abdullah, MK. 2011. Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Sandro Jaya.

Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. 2011. Kamus Bahasa Indonesia untuk Pelajar. Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Brown, Gillian dan George Yule. 1985. Discourse Analysis. London: Cambridge University Press.
Freedle, Roy. 1979. “Sociolinguistic Approach to Dialogue with Suggested Aplications to Cognitive Science”, di dalam Roy Freedle (ed.), New Directions in Discourse Processesing, Vol. II, Advances in Discourse Processes. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1970. “Language Structure and Language Function” di dalam J. Lyons (ed.), New Horizon in Linguistics. Harmondworth: Pinguin.
Heppy Atma Pratiwi dan Endang Wiyanti. 2017. Pola Komunikasi Interpersonal dalam Proses Bimbingan Skripsi. Vol.4 No.1 (2017). http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/dialektika/article/view/7001
Kridalaksana, Harimurti. 2011. Kamus Lingustik Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama-Kompas Gramedia.
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman Group Ltd.
Miller, Max. 1979. The Logic of Language in Early Childhood. New York: Springer.
Moates, Danny R. Dan Gary M. Schumacher. 1980. Cognitive Psychology. Belmont: Wodsworth Publishing Company.

Nadar, F.X. 2009. Pragmatik dan Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Poerwadarminta, WJS. 1966. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PN. Balai Pustaka.

Wardhaugh, Ronald. 1976. The Context of Language. Rowley: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.

Werth, Paul. 1984. Focus, Coherence, and Emphasis. London: Croom Helm.

Yasin, Anas. 2008. Tindak Tutur: Sebuah Model Gramatika Komunikatif. Padang: Sukabina Offset.