Functionalism Paradigm in Second Language Writing

A Systematic Literature Review using Corpus-based Analysis

Authors

  • Intan Pradita Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v5i1.1107

Keywords:

systematic literature review, functionalism paradigm, functional linguistics, second language writing, corpus based analysis

Abstract

This paper uses a corpus-based analysis systematic literature review to track the influence of functionalism paradigm in second language writing (SLW) over the last five years. The data were analyzed by using keywords and collocation analysis to map the closest association of functional paradigm to second language writing.  It was then reviewed manually and thematized based on the research questions as the framework. Based on a corpus of 46 Scopus indexed journals ranges from 2017-2022 this study reveals that the influence of functionalism paradigm does not directly affect to SLW. Functional paradigm spawned the concept of context which then be interpreted and manifested into functional linguistic approach. Thus, studies on SLW revolves around the application of systemic functional linguistics (SFL) to either teaching or assessing SLW. The elements of functionalism paradigm that affects to SLW are the basic assumption and the values of functional paradigm that perceived each variable in a text has a purpose. As an implication, second language writing composition using SFL focuses on text purpose and lexicogrammatical features. Functional linguists perceive language diversity in second language writing as functional, ensuring mutual intelligibility if communicative functions work effectively.

Author Biography

Intan Pradita, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Intan Pradita is a first year PhD student in the Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada and a lecturer in Universitas Islam Indonesia. Her research interests are Corpus Linguistics, English for Academic Purposes, Systemic Functional Linguistics, and Multilingualism. She has published some articles related to English Language Teaching in both national and international journals.

References

Abah, M. T. (2020). Implications of Functionalist Linguistics for Language Varieties: Instances of English Speeches from Charles Dickens’ Oliver Twist and Hard. Journal of English and Communication in Africa (JECA) Vol, 3(3&4).

Ahimsa-Putra, H. S. (2009). Paradigma Ilmu Sosial-Budaya: Sebuah Pandangan. Program Studi Linguistik, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Atkinson, D. (2010). Extended, embodied cognition and second language

Bierwiaczonek, K., & Waldzus, S. (2016). Socio-cultural factors as antecedents of cross-cultural adaptation in expatriates, international students, and migrants: A review. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 47(6), 767-817.

Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics. A&c Black.acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31(5), 599-622.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen (2014). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Third Edition. Great Britain: Hodder Arnold

Hu, X., Subramaniam, I., & Khan, A. B. B. M. A. (2022). Analysis of Genre Theory Based on Functional Linguistics of Halliday System. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 232-240

Hyland, K. (2021). Teaching and researching writing. Routledge.

Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2021). A bibliometric study of EAP research: Who is doing what, where and when? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 49, 100929.

Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge university press.

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses, Michigan classics ed.: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.

Jou, Y. (2019). Scaffolding L2 writers’ metacognitive awareness of voice in article reviews: A case study of SFL-based pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 41, 100770.

Lei, L., & Liu, D. (2019). Research trends in applied linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A bibliometric analysis and its implications. Applied Linguistics, 40(3), 540-561.

Malinowski, B. (1939). The group and the individual in functional analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 44(6), 938-964.

Martin, J. R., Maton, K., & Doran, Y. J. (Eds.). (2019). Accessing academic discourse: Systemic functional linguistics and legitimation code theory. Routledge.

Martin, J. R. (2016). Meaning matters: A short history of systemic functional linguistics. Word, 62(1), 35-58.

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. (2003). The language of evaluation (Vol. 2). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Matthiessen, C. M. (2019). Register in systemic functional linguistics. Register Studies, 1(1), 10-41.

Mauranen, A., Hynninen, N., & Ranta, E. (2016). English as the academic lingua franca. The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes, 44-55.

Ormerod, R. (2020). The history and ideas of sociological functionalism: Talcott Parsons, modern sociological theory, and the relevance for OR. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(12), 1873-1899.

Siedin, O. (2021). Revealing the Rationality of Myth: Contribution of Bronislaw Malinowski. Studia Polsko-Ukrai?skie, (8), 165-178.

Suryaningtyas, V. W., Nugroho, R. A., Cahyono, S. P., Nababan, M. R., & Santosa, R. (2019). Appraisal in Bilingual Tourism Information Media: Developing an SFL-Based Translation Model. ASIAN TEFL, 4(1), 1-12.

Thomas, M. (2019). Formalism and functionalism in linguistics: The engineer and the collector. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-31

How to Cite

Pradita, I. (2024). Functionalism Paradigm in Second Language Writing: A Systematic Literature Review using Corpus-based Analysis. SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education, 5(1), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v5i1.1107

Issue

Section

Articles