Examining Anti-Corruption Discourse: Discursive Resistance of Generation Z in Nepal on X

Authors

  • Vindy Thahura Ramadhani Universitas Bung Hatta
  • Setiono Sugiharto Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v7i2.2801

Keywords:

Anti-corruption discourse, generation Z, everyday resistance

Abstract

This study investigates anti-corruption discourse generated by Generation Z members in social media comments on platform X in reaction to anti-corruption protest announcements in Nepal. Whereas prior work on digital political engagement has tended to take a more macro-centric view of mobilization and organizational participation, there has been less focus on how mundane resistance is expressed in daily online exchanges. Drawing on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and a qualitative netnographic approach, the study analyzes public digital comments to examine the linguistic construction of anti-corruption demands at the micro level. The analysis shows that Generation Z uses a variety of discursive techniques such as supportive alignment, imperative expressions, moral condemnation, generational positioning, and affective intensification to articulate resistance. These strategies function as low-risk symbolic forms of everyday resistance that challenge political legitimacy and communicate collective dissatisfaction without formal organization. The findings indicate that social media comments operate as a major locus of digital political participation where anti-corruption criticism is normalized, circulated, and sustained through interactive communication practices. The study advances studies on critical discourse analysis by expanding the concept of everyday (or grassroots) resistance into digitally mediated environments and emphasizing the political implications of comment-level expression in contemporary networked publics.

References

Alodat, A., Al-Sarayreh, N., Ababneh, A. M., & Burgess, J. (2023). Social media platforms and political participation: A study on youth engagement. Social Sciences, 12(7), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12070402

Butkowski, C. P. (2025). Expressive data: Conceptualizing political expression through social media feeds. Political Communication, 43(3), 425-444 https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2025.2579716

Chan, M., & Yi, J. (2024). Social media use and political engagement in polarized times: Examining the contextual roles of issue and affective polarization in developed democracies. Political Communication, 41(5), 743-762 https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2325423

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge University Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Islam, M. A., Nur, S., Mahmud, I., Rakiv, M., Noor, R. N., & Moniruzzaman, M. (2025). Gen Z’s digital uprising in Bangladesh: The role of social media in political mobilization. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 102181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102181

Jude, A. V., & Padmavathi, P. (2026). Social media activism: Delving into Generation Z’s experiences. Communication Research and Practice. 12(1), 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2025.2554375

Kozinets, R. V. (2020). Netnography: The essential guide to qualitative social media research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Kubin, E., Merz, P., Wahba, M., Davis, C., Gray, K., & von Sikorski, C. (2024). Understanding news-related user comments and their effects: A systematic review. Frontiers in Communication, 9, 1447457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1447457

Lilja, M. (2022). The definition of resistance. Journal of Political Power, 15(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2022.2061127

Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale University Press.

Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. Yale University Press.

Su, M.-H., Suk, J., & Rojas, H. (2022). Social media expression, political extremity, and reduced network interaction. Social Media + Society, 8(1), 20563051211069056 https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211069056

Theocharis, Y., Boulianne, S., Koc-Michalska, K., & Bimber, B. (2023). Platform affordances and political participation: How social media reshape political engagement. West European Politics, 46(4), 788–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2087410

Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2022). Outside the bubble: Social media and political participation beyond echo chambers. Journal of Communication, 72(2), 227–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab054

Venus, A., Intyaswati, D., Ayuningtyas, F., & Lestari, P (2025). Political participation in the digital age: Impact of influencers and advertising on Generation Z. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1), 2520063. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2520063

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Ramadhani , V. T., & Sugiharto, S. (2026). Examining Anti-Corruption Discourse: Discursive Resistance of Generation Z in Nepal on X. SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education, 7(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v7i2.2801

Issue

Section

Articles