Academic Ethics and Moral Agency in EFL Writing: Census-Based Evidence from a Rural Vocational School on the West Sumatra-Riau Border

Authors

  • Geby Adrian Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Darmansyah Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • Maisarah Mitra Adrian Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v7i2.2882

Keywords:

academic ethics, Academic integrity, EFL writing, explanatory sequential design, moral agency, rural vocational school

Abstract

Academic ethics and moral agency are central to EFL writing, yet they remain underexamined in rural vocational schools where students often face limited linguistic, academic, and digital literacy support. This study examines academic ethics and moral agency in EFL writing among students at a small rural vocational school located on the West Sumatra-Riau border, Indonesia. Using an explanatory sequential mixed-method design, the study first conducted a census-based survey involving all 74 students, followed by interviews to explain the quantitative patterns. The findings showed moderate levels of academic ethics (M = 3.187, SD = 0.330) and moral agency (M = 3.182, SD = 0.350). Spearman correlation indicated a significant positive association between academic ethics and moral agency (? = .476, p < .001). Bootstrapped regression showed that academic ethics positively predicted moral agency (B = .599, 95% CI [.340, .834], R² = .319). Interview data revealed barriers related to limited vocabulary, weak grammar, translation-tool dependence, uncertain citation practices, copy-paste habits, and unequal group participation. The study contributes context-bound evidence that moral awareness in EFL writing does not automatically lead to ethical enactment. It argues for explicit, scaffolded, and context-sensitive writing ethics instruction in rural vocational EFL classrooms.

References

Adam, N., Abid, A., & Bantulu, Y. (2021). Challenges in teaching English writing skills: Lessons learnt from Indonesian high school English language teachers. Jambura Journal of English Teaching and Literature, 2(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.37905/jetl.v2i1.10632

Bebeau, M. J. (2002). The defining issues test and the four component model: Contributions to professional education. Journal of Moral Education, 31(3), 271–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724022000008115

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bretag, T. (2013). Challenges in addressing plagiarism in education. PLOS Medicine, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001574

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

Çelik, Ö., & Raz?, S. (2023). Facilitators and barriers to creating a culture of academic integrity at secondary schools: An exploratory case study. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00125-4

Chon, Y. V, Shin, D., & Kim, G. E. (2021). Comparing L2 learners’ writing against parallel machine-translated texts: Raters’ assessment, linguistic complexity and errors. System, 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102408

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400103

Integrity., I. C. for A. (2021). The fundamental values of academic integrity (3rd ed.). International Center for Academic Integrity. https://academicintegrity.org

Jamieson, S., & Howard, R. M. (2019). Rethinking the relationship between plagiarism and academic integrity. International Journal of Technologies in Higher Education, 16(2), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.18162/ritpu-2019-v16n2-07

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575

Keck, C. (2006). The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(4), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.006

Latif, D. A. (2002). The four component model of morality: Implications for pharmacy education. Journal of Pharmacy Teaching, 10(2), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.3109/J060v10n02_02

Lee, M. K. (2015). Peer feedback in second language writing: Investigating junior secondary students’ perspectives on inter-feedback and intra-feedback. System, 55, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.08.003

Lee, S.-M. (2020). The impact of using machine translation on EFL students’ writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1553186

Mahbub, M. A. (2018). English teaching in vocational high school: A need analysis. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 5(2), 229–258. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v5i2.835

Mariyam, S., Pratiwi, D., & Meraj, M. (2025). Challenges in teaching English in Indonesian rural schools: Issues and solution. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 13(3), 1469–1480. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v13i3.13481

McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2

Mejía, A., & Garcés-Flórez, M. F. (2025). What do we mean by academic integrity? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 21, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00176-1

Natsir, M., Purba, A. S., Ellyana, E., Saragih, A. T., & Amal, B. K. (2022). English teaching in an Indonesian vocational high school majoring industrial machinery engineering. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 1743–1754. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1221

Osbeck, C., Franck, O., Lilja, A., & Sporre, K. (2018). Possible competences to be aimed at in ethics education: Ethical competences highlighted in educational research journals. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 39(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2018.1450807

Pasaribu, A. N., Pasaribu, T. K., Siahaan, R. B., & Sitompul, D. S. (2024). Challenges for Indonesian EFL students in English academic writing. English Review: Journal of English Education, 12(2), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i2.9780

Pecorari, D., & Petri?, B. (2014). Plagiarism in second-language writing. Language Teaching, 47(3), 269–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000056

Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others’ words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588141

Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. Praeger.

Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Psychology Press.

Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591

Shi, L. (2004). Textual borrowing in second-language writing. Written Communication, 21(2), 171–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303262846

Storch, N. (2019). Collaborative writing. Language Teaching, 52(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000320

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Weigle, S. C., & Parker, K. (2012). Source text borrowing in an integrated reading/writing assessment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.004

Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2012). What role for collaboration in writing and writing feedback? Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.005

Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016). Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014). Language Teaching, 49(4), 461–493. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000161

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Adrian, G., Darmansyah, & Adrian , M. M. (2026). Academic Ethics and Moral Agency in EFL Writing: Census-Based Evidence from a Rural Vocational School on the West Sumatra-Riau Border. SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education, 7(2), 168–186. https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v7i2.2882

Issue

Section

Articles