Pronouns as Power: A Tripartite Linguistic Inquiry into Referent Erasure, Political Distance, and Deixis in Students’ English Debates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v7i2.2291Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis, Deixis, EFL Debates, Political Distance, Pronouns, Referent ErasureAbstract
This study investigated the ideological functions of pronouns in Indonesian EFL student political debates through a tripartite analytical framework consisting of referent erasure, political distance, and deixis. Grounded in Critical Discourse Analysis, the research examined how pronoun choices functioned not only as grammatical references but also as rhetorical strategies for negotiating power, alignment, and agency. The data were collected from 26 undergraduate students from Universitas Pembinaan Masyarakat Indonesia, Politeknik Angkatan Laut, and Institut Keislaman Tuah Negeri during six real-time English debate sessions conducted in 2026. Debate transcripts were analyzed qualitatively to identify patterns in the use of pronouns such as we, they, you, and impersonal constructions. The findings revealed that students strategically shifted pronoun usage to construct solidarity, distance opposing groups, obscure responsibility, and strengthen persuasive arguments within civic and political discussions. Pronouns thus operated as micro-sites of ideological negotiation that reflected identity positioning and contextual meaning-making. This study contributed to applied linguistics and English language education by demonstrating how EFL learners used grammatical forms to exercise voice, persuasion, and ideological stance in multilingual academic discourse.References
Adebayo, D. O., Sarah, I. O., Bassey, A. K., Omonfomhan, I. O., Bashir, P. I., Kehinde, O. A., & Chioma, I. (2025). Rhetoric of transition: A pragmatic analysis of inaugural speeches under extraordinary political succession in Nigeria. Path of Science, 11(5), 8006–8027.
Airlangga, S. A. (2024). Neoliberalism, governance, & capital accumulation: A study of development debates and social dynamics in Indonesia. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik), 28(2), 91–106.
Ali, S. I., & Saleem, A. (2024). Imran Khan's and Narendra Modi's speeches at the United Nations General Assembly: A meta-functional analysis. Pakistan Journal of Society, Education and Language (PJSEL), 10(2), 513–523.
Alisoy, H. (2025). Cohesion, persuasion, and ideology: The pragmatic functions of repetition in Trump’s rhetoric. Porta Universorum, 1(3), 80–86.
Amanda, R. A., & Handayani, T. (2024). Language, power, and ideology on Joe Biden's speech: A critical discourse analysis. ELTALL: English Language Teaching, Applied Linguistic and Literature, 5(2), 192–211.
Anwar, M. S., Bibi, S., & Mahboob, T. (2025). Analyzing language as a reflection and construction of individual and group ideologies in Pakistan and India conflict: A discourse-based study. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 9(2), 677–697.
Azizi M. G. (2025). The Dialectic of Deep Structure and Surface Structure in the Semantic Representation of Syntactic Constructions Based on Formalist Linguistics: A Case Study of Verb Reduction Transformation in the Substitute for the Cognate Accusative in Ayati’s Translation of the Qur’an. Translation Researches in the Arabic Language And Literature, 15(33), 102-123.
Bailey, A. H., Dembroff, R., Wodak, D., Ikizer, E. G., & Cimpian, A. (2024). People’s beliefs about pronouns reflect both the language they speak and their ideologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 153(5), 1388.
Cheng, L., Liu, X., & Si, C. (2024). Identifying stance in legislative discourse: A corpus-driven study of data protection laws. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–13.
Deichakivska, O. (2024). Predicative adjectives in the composition of expressions as tactics of positive and negative politeness strategies. Amazonia Investiga, 13(74), 239–247.
Dilkes, J. (2024). Metaphor signalling constructions in discourse related to the experience of depersonalization/derealization. Metaphor and Symbol, 39(4), 223–241.
Fajri, A. (2025). Rhetorical study of ideological representation in public discourse: A critical analysis of socio-cultural discourse: Studi retorika atas representasi ideologi dalam wacana masyarakat: Analisis kritis terhadap diskursus sosial budaya. ARSALINGUA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 1(1), 61–71.
Fatima, N., Ejaz, S. J., & Miran, G. (2025). Exploring the role of visual semiotics analysis in digital communication for ideological purposes; A study of memes and emojis. Liberal Journal of Language & Literature Review, 3(1), 345–364.
Fatmah, F., Lutpiah, I., Laden, S. S., Mulatsih, D., & Jaufillaili, J. (2024). A pragmatic study: Investigating the meaning of social deixis in spoken discourse. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 5(3), 96–107.
Fidyaningsih, A., & Oktavianti, I. N. (2024). Gender representation in Indonesian ELT textbooks of junior high school: A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 12(2), 1945–1962.
Fischer, A., Joosse, S., Strandell, J., Söderberg, N., Johansson, K., & Boonstra, W. J. (2024). How justice shapes transition governance: A discourse analysis of Swedish policy debates. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 67(9), 1998–2016.
Flusberg, S. J., Holmes, K. J., Thibodeau, P. H., Nabi, R. L., & Matlock, T. (2024). The psychology of framing: How everyday language shapes the way we think, feel, and act. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 25(3), 105–161.
Javed, M., & Shaheen, T. (2025). Dialogic reflection and discursive layers: A critical discourse analysis of Virginia Woolf’s The Mark on the Wall through Fairclough and Bakhtin. Journal of Language, Literature & Social Affairs, 1(2), 19–25.
Kyei, E., Afreh, E. S., Akoto, O. Y., Jujugenia, W. A., & Soadwah, K. (2025). A corpus-based cross-disciplinary study of unattended anaphoric pronouns in L2 postgraduate theses. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy (JELPA), 3(1), 1–14.
Lafta, H. T. (2024). Discursive tactics in political rhetoric: A Van Dijk framework analysis of the Trump-Biden debate 2024. International Journal of Linguistics Studies, 4(3), 89–94.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1984). Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press.
Makhloufi, I. B. M. (2025). A critical discourse analysis of modality in COVID-19 speeches: A systemic functional grammar perspective. Jordanian Educational Journal, 10(1), 331–353.
Nogue?Serrano, N. (2024). Participant self?reference, under?determination, generalisation, vagueness, and ambiguity in political discourse: A contrastive analysis of parliamentary debate and Twitter usages. Studia Linguistica, 78(1), 107–127.
O’rinbekovna, U. M. (2025). Grammatical, component, discourse, and conceptual ellipsis are examples of communicative gaps. Pedagogical Sciences and Teaching Methods, 4(41), 48–50.
Rachma, N. S., Fadila, A., Mar’an, D. A., & Dashela, T. (2025). The use of passive voice in political newspaper articles: A descriptive analysis of its frequency and functions. EDU SOCIETY: Jurnal Pendidikan, Ilmu Sosial dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 5(1), 948–953.
Raza, A., Shah, U. H., & Arshad, H. (2025). Critical discourse analysis of Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s speech on 11th August 1947. Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT), 8(1), 414–424.
Rehnberg, H. S. (2025). Positioning of applicants in asylum interviews: Case officers as recontextualising agents. Language in Society, 54(2), 343–365.
Samar, S., Ali, M., & Gul, N. (2025). Analysis of deixis in the speeches of Pakistani politicians at United Nations General Assembly. Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT), 8(1), 1238–1251.
Saraswati, P. I., & Pramiyanti, A. (2025). Critical discourse analysis news coverage on the Palestina-Israeli conflict: An Indonesia media perspective. Media Komunikasi FPIPS, 24(1), 07–20.
Stepkowska, A. (2024). Some bilingual couples speak lingua francas: Personal pronoun indexicality in the light of positioning theory. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 27(6), 870–881.
Thy, A. D. M., Gerona, J., Martínez-Ferreiro, S., Popov, S., & Boye, K. (2024). Deictic vs. anaphoric pronouns: A comparison of fluent and non-fluent aphasia in English and Tagalog. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 39(7), 909–923.
Trisnamayuni, A. M., Kadana, I. N., & Sujaya, I. N. (2025). Persona deixis in the Balinese script dialogue “Bogolan” by A. Wiyat S. Ardhi. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 11(1), 343–355.
Umam, K. (2025). Populism and the language of power: An analysis of critical discourse on the political speech of the president of the Republic of Indonesia. Journal of Language and Letters Education, 1(1), 30–40.
Zhao, H., Zhang, X., & Lee, Y. (2024). Transform the interchangeability of ‘we’ and ‘I’ for an ‘I write’ identity and authorial voice. American Journal of Educational Research, 12(3), 109–117.
Zhou, Q., & Larina, T. V. (2024). Power and solidarity in pronominal forms of address: A case study of Chinese and Russian teacher-student interactions. Training, Language and Culture, 8(1), 87–100.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Margaret Stevani, Evi Martiningsih , Tiara Panduwinata, Loso Judijanto, Rinovian Rais, Suroso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
